Oh, Be Careful!

Net Neuter — I mean, Neutrality

Hey, guess what? The government may not only fix the problems with our health care system, it may fix the Internet too. WOW. Did Christmas come early? Because this is terrific news!

Phil Kerpen of the Internet Freedom Coalition, however, makes it sound like a bad thing:

If you thought Washington—which already took over banking and autos, and is fast-tracking attempts to take over health care and energy—would leave the Internet alone, you were dead wrong. The Internet (perhaps our greatest free market success story in recent years) is squarely in the cross-hairs of the administration and it’s not waiting for Congress to act. The charge is being led by an eager, ideologically committed White House staffer named Susan Crawford.

The article goes on to say that Crawford, aka “Internet Czar,” has this pet project called OneWebDay. Two organizations that happen to be on the list of participants: ACORN and Free Press. Hmm.

Free Press was founded by Robert McChesney, an avowed Marxist who is Washington’s leading advocate of so-called network neutrality regulations who recently argued—on a Web site called SocialistProject.ca—that this type of Internet regulation is a prerequisite for a socialist revolution: “Instead of waiting for the revolution to happen, we learned that unless you make significant changes in the media, it will be vastly more difficult to have a revolution.”

Well that’s disconcerting. Good thing he’s just a lone nut!

Crawford and McChesney apparently have the full support of the Obama administration and an FCC that is determined to move toward transforming the Internet into a Washington-controlled utility as quickly as possible. The chairman of the Federal Communications Commission, Julius Genachowski, recently announced his pursuit of precisely the regulations they want.

The FCC isn’t pursuing this just because of orders coming from Obama’s Internet Czar. This goes all the way to the top—Obama himself said on the campaign trail last year: “I will take a back seat to no one in my commitment to net Neutrality.”

Oh.

Net neutrality regulations would destroy private investment and we would end up with a government-owned and controlled network. We’ll have nowhere to go if the government turns out to be not quite as benevolent as some have hoped.

Kinda like finding a lump of coal in your stocking, isn’t it?

You can read the entire article here.

Share and Enjoy:
  • Kirtsy
  • del.icio.us
  • StumbleUpon
  • Technorati
  • Digg
  • Facebook
  • Twitter

October 20, 2009 | Filed in: Politics

Sorry, comments are closed. (My inner introvert is running the show today.)